Search found 45 matches
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 6:10 pm
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Where to get KERMA data
- Replies: 28
- Views: 3931
Re: Where to get KERMA data
Thank you Riku!
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 11:25 pm
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Where to get KERMA data
- Replies: 28
- Views: 3931
Re: Where to get KERMA data
Apologies for bumping an old thread, but could the link be re-activated?
Thank you,
Drew
Thank you,
Drew
- Wed May 20, 2020 10:48 pm
- Forum: serpentTools
- Topic: Release 0.9.3
- Replies: 0
- Views: 778
Release 0.9.3
I am happy to announce that serpentTools 0.9.3 has been released, and is available for upgrade via pip. The changelog can be viewed via the hosted documentation or through the GitHub release. This is a backwards compatible release, with two main trends. First, many readers now support dictionary-lik...
- Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:40 pm
- Forum: serpentTools
- Topic: Future changes coming in version 0.10.0
- Replies: 0
- Views: 577
Future changes coming in version 0.10.0
Wonderful user community, The serpenttools python package will be undergoing a fairly substantial overhaul in the coming months leading up to version 0.10.0 (currently at 0.9.2). The primary goal of this release is to make serpentTools more like a library with generic file objects and containers det...
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:12 am
- Forum: Bugs, problems, questions & feeback
- Topic: Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1083
Re: Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
As an update, I ran select cases with 5 unique random seeds and everything looks agreeable now. The relative error to the reference case with 3-sigma confidence intervals is provided below. The reference is just a single pin directive placed inside a 3D box. fluxerror-tmc.png Thank you all for your ...
- Fri Apr 03, 2020 8:46 pm
- Forum: Bugs, problems, questions & feeback
- Topic: Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1083
Re: Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
All, Thank you for your insights. I hadn't considered the surface crossing and their impact on the random number sequences. That would certainly explain some other similar issues I'm seeing. This is something that should come out when I process the repeated runs. Once those are processed, I'll make ...
- Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:21 pm
- Forum: Bugs, problems, questions & feeback
- Topic: Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1083
Re: Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
Thank you for your reply. I'm using reflective boundary conditions in XY, vacuum axially. I haven't looked at repeated runs yet, but I'll post some results once I get them. As for source convergence, do you have any recommendations on particle settings? I'm using 100K particles per cycle, 200 active...
- Sat Mar 28, 2020 12:37 am
- Forum: Bugs, problems, questions & feeback
- Topic: Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1083
Impact on vertical lattices and detector fluxes
I believe I have stumbled on a strange geometry related issue. It appears, at least for a simple pin cell, the choice in vertical lattice structure changes the axial flux solution. The model is a single pincell, 360 cm tall with a single UO2 material defined. I have five cases that alter how the 3D ...
- Fri Mar 13, 2020 1:08 pm
- Forum: serpentTools
- Topic: Set axis range for plots
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1462
Re: Set axis range for plots
Thank you for providing the test file. If you look at the salt's burnup with grep MAT_salt_BURNUP test_dep.m you see an array of zeros present in the file. This is most curious. My best guess as to why the salt has zero burnup would be that it's specific power (MW/kgHM) is zero. The fact that the sa...
- Wed Mar 11, 2020 8:53 pm
- Forum: serpentTools
- Topic: Set axis range for plots
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1462
Re: Set axis range for plots
Ondrej, Thank you for those nice words! I'm glad you find this a useful tool. Per your first question, setting the axes limits is done through matplotlib, as you expressed. I think the second way, ax = r.plot('burnup', ['absKeff', 'colKeff']) ax.set_ylim(...) ax.set_xlim(...) would be the best. It a...