Fusion

Discussion on physics, models and calculation methods
User avatar
Jaakko Leppänen
Site Admin
Posts: 2442
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:43 pm
Security question 2: 0
Location: Espoo, Finland
Contact:

Re: Fusion

Post by Jaakko Leppänen » Wed Oct 02, 2019 5:48 pm

Do you mean the problem of zero results? In the previous case it turned out to be just poor statistics. The standard cell flux detector is based on the collision flux estimator, which doesn't perform too well for small volumes. I recommend you use the track-length estimator-type detector instead:

http://serpent.vtt.fi/mediawiki/index.p ... al#det_dtl

Also, there is a paper a paper related to this issue which might be worth reading:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.006
- Jaakko

User avatar
M.K.
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:45 pm
Security question 1: No
Security question 2: 72

Re: Fusion

Post by M.K. » Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:23 pm

Dear Jaakko,

Is it possible to send me this paper? The source as you also confirmed has to be very close to the detector in order to obtain some counts
but that's not what I am after so I guess I have to try the track length.

Best regards!

Post Reply